Do planarians need their brain to react to abused drugs? Well, it depends on the drug…

This is my first post specifically on one of the papers from my laboratory.  As an introduction, I want to remind you that I use planarians in pharmacology research.

The title of the paper essentially answers the question that is serving as the title of this post: “Planarians require an intact brain to behaviorally react to cocaine, but not to react to nicotine.”  It appeared in the journal “Neuroscience”, published by the International Brain Research Organization (IBRO).  I will put the complete reference at the end.

Anyway, probably the main spirit of the paper is summarized by the following sentence, taken from the introduction: “Given the power of modern molecular techniques, it is easy to forget that the ultimate objective of physiological discoveries is to find their possible significance within the context of the whole organism, particularly its behavior.”   I truly think so because frequently many scientists (and I have been caught in that myself; I am as much a sinner as the next scientist) fail to see the metaphorical forest because of the fascination with a particular tree.  In other words, sometimes we get lost in the details and forget that an organism is an unified entity.

Anyway, several years ago I had the opportunity to meet Dr. Kiyokazu Agata, one of the most preeminent researchers in the area of animal regeneration (and a really, and I mean REALLY nice guy).  He mentioned that he used to determine whether a particular substance was psychoactive in planarians by testing it in decapitated worms, and we decided to use this method to test the type of substances that we work with in my lab.  We actually acknowledged him in the paper for his suggestion… (:-)…

The type of behavior that I decided to use in our paper was the induction of seizure-like behavior.  In a previous post I included a link to a short video showing this behavior.  This behavior is easily quantifiable and many types of substances induce it, so, despite being pretty non-specific is very useful to screen for potentially neuroactive drugs.  We use other types of behavior to study drugs; I will talk about them in a future post.

The two drugs that we used were nicotine and cocaine.  Before going any further, let me give you an idea of the amounts that we use on the worms.  Also, let me tell you that we do not store any drugs, legal or otherwise in my laboratory; as you may imagine, some of those are highly regulated.  In our experiments we use a maximal amount of about 35 micrograms (ug) per worm.  Let me give you some perspective on how tiny this amount is.  Below there is a picture of a ball point pen and its cap, besides a penny.  A penny weighs about 3 grams and you will need three pen caps to match that weight.  Therefore a ballpoint pen cap weighs about a gram.

Slide4

Picture credit; Wikimedia commons and Baldscientist

Bear with me, I like explaining things…

Now, if you take a very sharp scalpel and cut that cap into a thousand pieces, each one of those will be about a milligram (mg), and if you take one of those small pieces and cut it in yet another thousand pieces, you will have a microgram (ug).  Now you should have an idea of how small is the amount of the compounds that we use in our experiments.  A ug is 0.000001 the weight of a ballpoint pen cap.

Anyway, we tested close to 10 compounds in our initial screening; this is being described in a couple of papers in preparation.  The two compounds that I decided to publish first were nicotine and cocaine.  Both compounds are able to induce the seizure-like movements in planarians so we thought that if we tested them in decapitated planarians (I should have posted this on Halloween…) they would not display any reaction.  at least that was the idea…

The worms exposed to cocaine did not react, as expected.  However, the ones exposed to nicotine, did not care, they twitched the same whether they had a head or not!  This made things really interesting and made us think about the role of the brain on the worm’s reaction to cocaine.

Please remember that the type of planarians that we work with are the kind that regenerate after injury; they are able to grow a new head and therefore a new brain.  I say this just in case you were worried about the little wormies… No, they did not die…

The first thing that we did was to follow up the recovery of their sensitivity to cocaine as a function of head regeneration over time.  Here’s what we got:

Slide1

Picture credit: Modified from Pagán et al., (2013)

It gets better; our results showed that they began to recover their behavior at day 4, which correlated with the experiments of others showing that the two hemispheres of the planarian brain start regaining their connectivity at roughly the 4th day post-decapitation.  This is one of the exciting things about science, when results done a continent away are consistent with your own…

Anyway, we then went nuts with the scalpel.  We tested the planarian behavioral reaction to cocaine upon the following conditions:

Slide2

Picture credit: Baldscientist.

Basically, they completely lost their reaction to cocaine upon decapitation, the behavior significantly decreased upon any cut near the head and they did not lose the behavior upon losing their tail tip…

So what does these results mean? At first glance they seem to indicate that the organization of the nervous system (including the neuromuscular system) in planarians is similar to the arrangement found in vertebrates, where many receptors for nicotine are located outside of the brain and nervous system; in fact, by sheer amount there are more nicotine receptors in vertebrate muscle cells that in the brain itself. These receptors control muscle contraction. In contrast, there do no seem to be any cocaine receptors capable of inducing significant changes in muscle physiology. This is intriguing and exciting, because it validates the usefulness of planarians as a pharmacological model…

Now I am planning even more interesting things, like going molecular to try to “dissect” the behavior…  stay tuned!

By the way, our paper made the cover of the journal… (:-D)…

NSC-OC.indd

Picture credit: IBRO.

If you want to know more

Fraguas S et al. (2012) Regeneration of neuronal cell types in Schmidtea mediterranea: an immunohistochemical and expression study.  Int J Dev Biol 56(1-3):143-53.

Pagán OR et al. (2013) Planarians require an intact brain to behaviorally react to cocaine, but not to react to nicotine. Neuroscience. 246:265-70.

Pagán OR et al. (2009) A cembranoid from tobacco prevents the expression of nicotine-induced withdrawal behavior in planarian worms.  Eur J Pharmacol. 615(1-3):118-24.

Rawls SM et al. (2011) Nicotine Behavioral Pharmacology: clues from planarians.  Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Nov 1;118(2-3):274-9.

 

~~

**If you like what I write, kindly spread the word about this blog!

**I am a published writer! For my Amazon author page, click here.

**Want to see more of the things I write? Go here for some other posts.

**Shoot me a message if you have any questions! (orpagan@yahoo.com)

**You can subscribe to my blog! Just go to the “Home” page, right hand side.

**Here’s a link to my Facebook page

**Finally, my Twitter name: @Baldscientist

**For the customary (and very important) disclaimers please go to my “About” page…

 

Advertisements
Categories: Tags: , , , , , , ,

11 Comments

  1. Congratulations Oné for the paper. So, please tell us then about nicotine, why planarians react to it even if they don’t have a brain? the behavioral defect seems to be the same in intact animals for cocaine and nicotine, so why the difference once you decapitate them?

    1. Thanks Francesc! Now that i went back to the post, I realized that I did not talk about the main interpretation, which we discussed in the paper… Sorry and thanks! I will update the post accordingly.

      In the meantime, briefly, I think that what is happening is that the nicotine situation in planarians mimics what occurs in vertebrates, where many nicotinic receptors are located periferally, outside of the nervous system… In vertebrates these nicotinic receptors are mainly found in muscle tissue, but I do not know what neurotransmitters do planaria use for muscle contraction. Do you know?

      The next thing that i am planning to do researchwise is to try to identify nicotinic receptor subtypes via fluorescence microscopy… (:-)…

      About the blog, am preparing a post of one of my older papers (2009) where I do nicotinic pharmacology in planarians. Hope to talk to you soon and thanks for reading!

      1. Hi Oné

        I don’t know about specific neurotransmitters used for planarian muscle contraction. I have done in the past some in situs for homologs of muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that were expressed in the CNS but not in the muscle (at least that I can remember).

  2. What is the difference between “human stem” cells and planarian regeneration? It would seem (to me at least) there may be evolutionary overlap (I obviously use the terms “evolutionary overlap” with some ignorance)?

    1. Hi John! Many types of planarians (not all of them for sure) can regenerate because they have a rather efficient type of “stem cell”; planarian biologists call them “neoblasts”; this term was around well before the stem cell research boom; these cells have been called neoblasts since 1897!

      Nowadays many scientists call them planarian stem cell without a doubt to make the subject more “sexier” for grant submission purposes. Here is a rather nice review paper from one of the experts in the area (it’s open access):

      http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper/113463jb/the-planarian-neoblast-the-rambling-history-of-its-origin-and-some-current-black-boxes

      This review appeared in a special issue of the International Journal of Developmental Biology:

      http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/issues/contents/vol/56/issue/1-2-3

      I will soon email you privately to update you on “my special project”…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s