First things first: I consider myself a very hopeful agnostic. Also, I do not care at all for angry atheists (or theists), who are waaaaay different from genuinely thoughtful, polite people who happen to be atheists (or theists). For more on this thought as well as for my current views on spirituality please go here. It is only fair to state from the very beginning that I am very interested on the topic of this book for intellectual as well as for emotional reasons. Moreover, I have no academic training in theology or any related discipline. On the other hand, I am a very well trained practicing scientist and educator, as well as an author. You have been warned!
Here’s my review.
If I had to characterize this book in a phrase, it would be “apologetics light“. And I love that is it written that way. As expected in a book of this nature, I found myself strongly agreeing with some points while equally strongly disagreeing with some others. In fact, one of the things that I liked the most about this book is that I was not indifferent to any of its points; the book was that well written!
For example, one of the points which I found myself wholeheartedly agreeing with was the critique of the usual atheist reply whenever the topic of “meaning” is raised, namely that if God is out of the picture one has to create such meaning. I have always found this reasoning quite silly because it is as if I would award myself an academic degree or as if I named myself “husband of the year“. Both propositions are nonsensical for (I hope) obvious reasons. You get the picture.
In more than one instance I found myself misty-eyed when reading passages of the book. For example, one of them was the allusion to when “… every tear is wiped away…” (page 84). This happens to be one of my favorite biblical passages. Another sentence that touched me deeply was: “For many people, God may represent the only possibility for a hope for ultimate redemption and justice in a world in which they drew the shortest of straws” (page 83). There are many such gems in the book, and I do not want to mention any more of them lest I spoil the book for you. Have fun finding them! Also, in addition of being very well written, it is a very easy read: conversational, personal, and engaging.
One thing that I did not like about the book was that it did not include an index. This fact made the writing of my review more difficult, but most importantly, the lack of a proper index limits the book’s usefulness as a resource for study groups or any related activity. Perhaps an index could be included in the reprint edition? Also, I am not sure that an ironclad case for the truth of Christianity can be established based solely on the arguments exposed in the book. This book will not convince any “serious doubter” (like yours truly) to embrace the Christian faith, and in fact this is ok because this is not what the book is about. Its main purpose is to make readers think, and hopefully initiate conversations based on the points raised; and in this sense, it suceeds beautifully.
Note: I wish to thank Ms. Elizabeth Neep, Publicity Executive & Commissioning Editor of the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge (SPCK), who sent me a review copy of the book and a very nice handwritten note. Much appreciated!
Another note: I will post an abbreviated version of this review at the”-azon” website (:-)…
Picture credit: SPCK
**If you like what I write, kindly spread the word about this blog!
**For a list of all my scientific papers please click HERE.
**I wrote the first chapter on this technical book.
**I wrote a popular science book and a second one will be published soon! For my Amazon author page, click here.
**Want to see more of the things I write? Go here for some other posts.
**Shoot me a message if you have any questions! (email@example.com)
**You can subscribe to my blog! Just go to the “Home” page, right hand side.
**Here’s a link to my Facebook page
**Finally, my Twitter name: @Baldscientist
**For the customary (and very important) disclaimers please go to my “About” page…